Suicide Prevention Scientific Information: Prevention Strategies

Suicide is a Serious Problem – Best Suicide Prevention

Suicide is a serious problem that can have lasting harmful effects on individuals, families, and communities. The goal for the prevention of suicidal behavior is simple: stop it from happening in the first place. However, the solutions are just as complex as the problem.


Suicide Prevention Should Reduce Risk Factors – Best Suicide Prevention

Prevention efforts should ultimately reduce risk factors and promote protective factors. In addition, prevention should address all levels that influence suicide: individual, relationship, community, and society. Effective prevention strategies are necessary to promote awareness about suicide and to foster a commitment to social change.


Effective and Promising Programs – Best Suicide Prevention

Suicide Prevention Resource Center* The Suicide Prevention Resource Center (SPRC), in collaboration with the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (AFSP), maintains the Best Practices Registry (BPR). This project is funded by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). The purpose of the BPR is to identify, review, and disseminate information about best practices that address specific objectives of the National Strategy for Suicide Prevention. The BPR has three sections: Section I: Evidence-Based Programs (including 1a: SAMHSA’s National Registry of Evidence-Based Programs and Practices; and 1b: SPRC/AFSP Evidence-Based Practices); Section II: Expert and Consensus Statements; and Section III: Adherence to Standards.


Systematic Reviews – Best Suicide Prevention

Crowley P, Kilroe J, Burke S. Youth suicide prevention: evidence briefing. Ireland: Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Health Development Agency; 2004.


Reducing Suicide – Best Suicide Prevention

Goldsmith SK, Pellmar TC, Kleinman AM, Bunney WE, eds. Reducing suicide: a national imperative. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2002. Available on-line at http://www.nap.edu/books/0309083214/html/.*


Youth Suicide Risk – Best Suicide Prevention

Gould MS, Greenberg T, Velting DM & Shaffer D. Youth suicide risk and preventive interventions: A review of the past 10 years. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 2003;42:386-405.


Potential for Preventing Suicide – Best Suicide Prevention

Gunnell DJ. The potential for preventing suicide: a review of the literature on the effectiveness of interventions aimed at preventing suicide. Bristol: HCEU, University of Bristol; 1994.


Efficacy of Suicide Prevention – Best Suicide Prevention

Guo B, Harstall C. Efficacy of suicide prevention programmers for children and youth. Edmonton: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research, Health Technology Assessment, Report No. HTA 26; 2002.


Suicide Prevention Strategies – Best Suicide Prevention

Guo B, Scott A, Bowker S. Suicide prevention strategies: Evidence from systematic reviews. Edmonton: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research, Health Technology Assessment, Report No. HTA 28; 2003.


Treatments for Deliberate Self Harm – Best Suicide Prevention

Hawton K, Townsend E, Arensman E, Gunnell D, Hazell P,House A, et al. Psychosocial and pharmacological treatments for deliberate self harm. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 1999; issue 4, art.No.:CD001764.DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001764.


Interventions to Prevent Suicidal Behavior – Best Suicide Prevention

Knox, KL. Interventions to prevent suicidal behavior. In: Doll L, Bonzo S, Sleet D, Mercy J, Hass E, eds. Handbook of injury and violence prevention. New York, NY: Springer; 2007. p.183-201.


Behavioral Treatments of Suicidal Behaviors – Best Suicide Prevention

Linehan MM. Behavioral treatments of suicidal behaviors. New York: Annals New York Academy of Sciences; 1997. p. 302-29.


Suicide Prevention Strategies – Best Suicide Prevention

Mann JJ, Apter A, Bertolote J, et al. Suicide prevention strategies: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association 2005;294;2064-74.


National Youth Suicide Prevention Strategy – Best Suicide Prevention

National Health and Medical Research Council. National youth suicide prevention strategy-setting the evidence-based research agenda for Australia. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia Department of Health and Aged Care; 1999.


Systematic Overview of Adolescent Suicidal Prevention Programs – Best Suicide Prevention

Ploeg J, Ciliska D, Dobbins M, Hayward S, Thomas H, Underwood J. A systematic overview of adolescent suicide prevention programs. Canadian Journal of Public Health 1996;87(5):319-24.


School Based Curriculum Suicide Programs – Best Suicide Prevention

Ploeg J, Ciliska D, Brunton G, MacDonnell J, O’Brien MA. The effectiveness of school-based curriculum suicide prevention programs for adolescents. Dundas, ON: Region of Hamilton-Wentworth, Social and Public Health Services Division, Community Support and Research Branch, PHRED Program, Effective Public Health Practice Project; 1999. pages i-31.


“Before the Fact” Preventions – Best Suicide Prevention

White J, Jodoin N. “Before-the-fact” interventions: a manual of best practices in youth suicide prevention. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: British Columbia Ministry for Children and Families; 1998.


Effective Suicide Preventions – Best Suicide Prevention

World Health Organization Evidence Network. For which strategies of suicide prevention is there evidence of effectiveness? Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe. Updated 2004 November 1; Last accessed 2005 April 30. Available at http://www.euro.who.int/eprise/main/WHO/Progs/HEN/Syntheses/suicideprev/20040712_2.


World Report on Violence and Health – Best Suicide Prevention

This report is the first comprehensive review of violence on a global scale. Chapter 7 provides detailed information on self-directed violence, including prevention strategies.


Guidelines and Planning Tools – National Strategy for Suicide Prevention – Best Suicide Prevention

The National Strategy for Suicide Prevention (NSSP) is the first attempt in the United States to prevent suicide through a systematic approach. It lays out a framework for developing an array of suicide prevention services and programs. The NSSP emphasizes coordination of resources and the application of culturally appropriate services at all levels of government and in the private sector.

Content Provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Risk Factors for Suicide

Factors Related to Suicide – Help with Suicide Attempts

A combination of individual, relational, community, and societal factors contribute to the risk of suicide. Risk factors are those characteristics associated with suicide—they may or may not be direct causes.


Family History of Suicde – Help with Suicide Attempts

Family history of suicide


Family History of Child Maltreatment – Help with Suicide Attempts

Family history of child maltreatment


Previous Suicide Attempts – Help with Suicide Attempts

Previous suicide attempt(s)


History of Mental Disorders – Help with Suicide Attempts

History of mental disorders, particularly depression


History of Alcohol and Substance Abuse – Help with Suicide Attempts

History of alcohol and substance abuse


Feelings of Hopelessness – Help with Suicide Attempts

Feelings of hopelessness


Impulsive or Aggressive Tendencies – Help with Suicide Attempts

Impulsive or aggressive tendencies


Cultural and Religious Beliefs – Help with Suicide Attempts

Cultural and religious beliefs (e.g., belief that suicide is noble resolution of a personal dilemma)


Local Epidemics of Suicide – Help with Suicide Attempts

Local epidemics of suicide


Isolation – Help with Suicide Attempts

Isolation, a feeling of being cut off from other people


Barriers to Accessing Mental Health Treatment – Help with Suicide Attempts

Barriers to accessing mental health treatment


Loss – Help with Suicide Attempts

Loss (relational, social, work, or financial)


Physical Illness – Help with Suicide Attempts

Physical illness


Easy Access to Lethal Methods – Help with Suicide Attempts

Easy access to lethal methods


Unwillingness to Seek Help – Help with Suicide Attempts

Unwillingness to seek help because of the stigma attached to mental health and substance abuse disorders or to suicidal thoughts


Protective Factors for Suicide – Help with Suicide Attempts

Protective factors buffer individuals from suicidal thoughts and behavior. To date, protective factors have not been studied as extensively or rigorously as risk factors. Identifying and understanding protective factors are, however, equally as important as researching risk factors.


Protective Factors – Help with Suicide Attempts

Effective clinical care for mental, physical, and substance abuse disorders


Easy Access to Clinical Interventions – Help with Suicide Attempts

Easy access to a variety of clinical interventions and support for help seeking


Family and Community Support – Help with Suicide Attempts

Family and community support


Support from Medical and Mental Health Care Relationships – Help with Suicide Attempts

Support from ongoing medical and mental health care relationships


Skills in Problem Solving – Help with Suicide Attempts

Skills in problem solving, conflict resolution, and nonviolent way of handling disputes


Cultural and Religious Belies – Help with Suicide Attempts

Cultural and religious beliefs that discourage suicide and support instincts for self-preservation

Content Provided by the National Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Suicide Trends Among Youths and Young Adults Aged 10--24 Years

Suicide is the Third Leading Cause of Death – Teen Suicide Why???

In 2004, suicide was the third leading cause of death among youths and young adults aged 10-24 years in the United States, accounting for 4,599 deaths (1,2). During 1990-2003, the combined suicide rate for persons aged 10-24 years declined 28.5%, from 9.48 to 6.78 per 100,000 persons (2). However, from 2003 to 2004, the rate increased by 8.0%, from 6.78 to 7.32 (2), the largest single-year increase during 1990-2004. To characterize U.S. trends in suicide among persons aged 10-24 years, CDC analyzed data recorded during 1990-2004, the most recent data available. Results of that analysis indicated that, from 2003 to 2004, suicide rates for three sex-age groups (i.e., females aged 10-14 years and 15-19 years and males aged 15-19 years) departed upward significantly from otherwise declining trends. Results further indicated that suicides both by hanging/suffocation and poisoning among females aged 10-14 years and 15-19 years increased from 2003 to 2004 and were significantly in excess of trends in both groups. The results suggest that increases in suicide and changes in suicidal behavior might have occurred among youths in certain sex-age groups, especially females aged 10-19 years. Closer examination of these trends is warranted at federal and state levels. Where indicated, health authorities and program directors should consider focusing suicide-prevention activities on these groups to help prevent suicide rates from increasing further.


Annual Data on Suicide – Teen Suicide Why???

Annual data on suicides in the United States during 1990-2004 (1) were obtained from the National Vital Statistics System via WISQARS™ (2) by sex, three age groups (i.e., 10-14, 15-19, and 20-24 years), and the three most common suicide methods (firearm, hanging/suffocation,* and poisoning†). Although coding of mortality data changed from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) to the Tenth Revision (ICD-10) beginning in 1999, near total agreement exists between the two revisions regarding classification of suicides (3). Suicide trends during the 15-year period were examined for each sex-age group overall and by method, using a negative binomial rate regression model. Differences between observed rates and model-estimated rates for each year were evaluated using standardized Pearson residuals, which account for the general level of variability in the year-to-year rates. Standardized Pearson residuals >2 or <-2 were used to identify unusual departures from the modeled rate trends. A comprehensive explanation of these methods has been published previously (4).


Significant Upward Departures from Model Trends – Teen Suicide Why???

Significant upward departures from modeled trends in 2004 were identified in total suicide rates for three of the six sex-age groups: females aged 10-14 years and 15-19 years and males aged 15-19 years (Table). The largest percentage increase in rates from 2003 to 2004 was among females aged 10-14 years (75.9%), followed by females aged 15-19 years (32.3%) and males aged 15-19 years (9.0%). In absolute numbers, from 2003 to 2004, suicides increased from 56 to 94 among females aged 10-14 years, from 265 to 355 among females aged 15-19 years, and from 1,222 to 1,345 among males aged 15-19 years.


Suicide Method Statistics – Teen Suicide Why???

In 1990, firearms were the most common suicide method among females in all three age groups examined, accounting for 55.2% of suicides in the group aged 10-14 years, 56.0% in the group aged 15-19 years, and 53.4% in the group aged 20-24 years. However, from 1990 to 2004, among females in each of the three age groups, significant downward trends were observed in the rates both for firearm suicides (p<0.01) and poisoning suicides (p<0.05), and a significant increase was observed in the rate for suicides by hanging/suffocation (p<0.01). In 2004, hanging/suffocation was the most common method among females in all three age groups, accounting for 71.4% of suicides in the group aged 10-14 years, 49% in the group aged 15-19 years, and 34.2% in the group aged 20-24 years. In addition, from 2003 to 2004, hanging/suffocation suicide rates among females aged 10-14 and 15-19 years increased by 119.4% (from 0.31 to 0.68 per 100,000 persons) and 43.5% (from 1.24 to 1.78), respectively (Figures 1 and 2). In absolute numbers, from 2003 to 2004, suicides by hanging/suffocation increased from 32 to 70 among females aged 10-14 years and from 124 to 174 among females aged 15-19 years. Aside from 2004, the only other significant departure from trend among females in these two age groups during 1990-2004 was in suicides by hanging/suffocation among females aged 15-19 years in 1996 (Figure 2).


Reported by Reference – Teen Suicide Why???

Reported by: KM Lubell, PhD, SR Kegler, PhD, AE Crosby, MD, D Karch, PhD, Div of Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC. Editorial Note:


2004 Suicide Trends – Teen Suicide Why???

The findings in this report indicate that 2004 suicide rates for males aged 15-19 years and females aged 10-14 years and 15-19 years diverged upward significantly from modeled trends during 1990-2004. For females in the two age groups, significant departures were observed for 2004 in suicides by hanging/suffocation and poisoning. The rate for suicide by hanging/suffocation among females aged 10-14 years more than doubled from 2003 to 2004, from 0.31 to 0.68 per 100,000 population. During 1990-2003, the highest yearly rate for such deaths among females in this age group was 0.35 per 100,000 population in 1998.


Risk Factors for Suicide in Young Females – Teen Suicide Why???

The marked increases in suicide rates among females in the two younger age groups suggest possible changes in risk factors for suicide and the methods used, with greater use of methods (e.g., hanging by rope) that are readily accessible (5). Scientific knowledge regarding risk factors for suicide in young females is limited. Research that focuses on suicide mortality has emphasized males, who constitute approximately three fourths of suicide decedents aged 10-19 years (2). In contrast, research on suicidal behavior among females primarily has examined factors related to suicidal thoughts and nonfatal self-inflicted injuries. One comparative study, conducted in Singapore, suggested that perceptions of interpersonal relationship problems are more common among young female suicide decedents than among their male counterparts (6). Family discord, legal/disciplinary problems, school concerns, and mental health conditions such as depression increase the risk for suicide among youths of both sexes (6,7). Drug/alcohol use can exacerbate these problems (7).


Adolescents “Playing the Choking Game” – Teen Suicide Why???

Recent reports have detailed unintentional asphyxia fatalities resulting from adolescents playing “the choking game” (i.e., intentionally restricting the supply of oxygen to the brain, often with a ligature, to induce a brief euphoria). Some of these fatalities likely are misclassified as suicides. However, such deaths are unlikely to account for a substantial portion of the recent increases in hanging/suffocation suicides among young girls. The available evidence suggests that choking-game fatalities occur predominantly among boys (8). In addition, analysis of hanging/suffocation deaths classified as unintentional or undetermined in this population did not reveal increases that paralleled those in hanging/suffocation suicides (CDC, unpublished data, 2007).


Suicide Study Limitations – Teen Suicide Why???

The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, because U.S. mortality data currently are available only through 2004, whether the increases observed in 2004 represent changes in trends or single-year anomalies is not clear and suggests a need for further study as more current data become available. Second, official mortality data for suicides might include classification errors. Previous research has highlighted the extent to which suicides are undercounted (9). Finally, because U.S. mortality data include limited variables, these data do not allow examination of potential differences or changes in the underlying risk factors for fatal suicidal behavior among young females. Other data sources (e.g., the National Violent Death Reporting System) that collect a broader array of information about the circumstances surrounding suicides (10) might provide additional insights.


Mutability of Young Suicidal Behavior – Teen Suicide Why???

These findings demonstrate the potential mutability of youth suicidal behavior. Public health researchers and suicide-prevention practitioners need to learn more about both the risk factors for suicide among young females and effective strategies for suicide prevention. The trends in suicide rates and methods described in this report, if confirmed, suggest that prevention measures focused solely on restricting access to the most lethal means are likely to have limited success. Prevention measures should address the underlying reasons for suicide in populations that are vulnerable. References

1. National Center for Health Statistics. Multiple cause-of-death public-use data files, 1990 through 2004. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Health Statistics; 2007. 2. CDC. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS™). Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2007. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/wisqars/default.htm. 3. Anderson RN, Minino AM, Fingerhut LA, Warner M, Heinen MA. Deaths: injuries, 2001. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2004;52:1-5. 4. Agresti A. An introduction to categorical data analysis. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2007. 5. CDC. Methods of suicide among persons aged 10-19 years—United States, 1992-2001. MMWR 2004;53:471-4. 6. Ang RP, Chia BH, Fung DSS. Gender differences in life stressors associated with child and adolescent suicides in Singapore from 1995 to 2003. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2006;52:561-70. 7. Kloos AL, Collins R, Weller RA, Weller EB. Suicide in preadolescents: who is at risk? Curr Psychiatry Rep 2007;9:89-93. 8. Le D, Macnab AJ. Self strangulation by hanging from cloth towel dispensers in Canadian schools. Inj Prev 2001;7:231-3. 9. O’Carroll PW. A consideration of the validity and reliability of suicide mortality data. Suicide Life Threat Behav 1989;19:1-16. 10. Steenkamp M, Frazier L, Lipskiy N, et al. The National Violent Death Reporting System: an exciting new tool for public health surveillance. Inj Prev 2006;12(Suppl 2):ii3-5.

Content Provided by the National Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Preventing Suicide

The Facts – Suicide com Prevention

Someone commits suicide every 17 minutes. In 2002, 31,655 Americans took their own lives. Suicide was the third leading cause of death among 15- to 24-year-olds, the fourth leading cause among 25- to 44-year-olds, and the eighth leading cause among 45- to 64-year-olds. Though suicide is a serious problem among youth and adults, death rates continue to be highest among older adults ages 65 and over.


Impact of Suicidal Behavior – Suicide com Prevention

The number of deaths from suicide reflects only a small portion of the impact of suicidal behavior. In 2002, more than 90,000 people were hospitalized following suicide attempts. More than 324,000 were treated in hospital emergency departments for deliberate self harm. Deaths and injuries from suicidal behavior represent a substantial drain on the economic, social, and health resources of the nation. Suicide accounts for $25 billion each year in direct costs, including health care services, funeral services, autopsies and investigations, and indirect costs like lost productivity. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) seeks to lessen these burdens by developing and promoting policies and practices that effectively prevent suicide and suicidal behaviors. One of the greatest challenges in the field of suicide prevention is identifying promising strategies and programs. CDC must continue to research effective prevention strategies and to develop and evaluate new ones. CDC must communicate information about what works to practitioners in the field as data becomes available.


Key Partners – Suicide com Prevention

Preventing suicide and suicidal behavior requires the support and contributions of many partners: federal agencies, state and local health departments, nonprofit organizations, academic institutions, international agencies, and private industry. Partners help in a variety of ways, including collecting data about suicide, learning about risk factors, developing strategies for prevention, and ensuring that effective prevention approaches reach those in need. CDC collaborates regularly with these groups as evidenced by the Surgeon General’s National Strategy to Prevent Suicide.


New Direction – Suicide com Prevention

CDC is moving the injury and violence prevention field toward primary prevention and early intervention by exploring ways to prevent suicide before it occurs. CDC’s key activity areas for violence prevention include:

  • Surveillance
  • Research
  • Capacity building
  • Communication
  • Partnership
  • Leadership


Violence prevention Activities – Suicide com Prevention

CDC’s violence prevention activities are guided by four key principles:

  • An emphasis on primary prevention
  • A commitment to advancing the science of prevention
  • A focus on translating scientific advances into practical application through effective programs and policies
  • A commitment to building on the efforts of others by addressing gaps or needs. Additional information about CDC’s suicide prevention programs is available at www.cdc.gov/injury.


Monitoring, Tracking, and Researching the Problem – Suicide com Prevention

National Violent Death Reporting System State and local agencies have detailed information from medical examiners, coroners, police, crime labs, and death certificates that could answer important, fundamental questions about trends and patterns of violence. However, the information is fragmented and difficult to access. Seventeen states are currently part of the National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS)—Alaska, California, Colorado, Georgia, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Mexico, North Carolina, New Jersey, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Utah, Virginia, and Wisconsin. These states gather, share, and link state-level data about violence. NVDRS enables CDC and states to access vital, state level information to gain a more accurate understanding of the problem of violence. This will enable policy makers and community leaders to make informed decisions about violence prevention strategies and programs, including those that address suicide. Contact: Etiology and Surveillance Branch 770-488-4410 ohcinfo@cdc.gov


Definitions for Suicide – Suicide com Prevention

Uniform Definitions for Suicide Standard definitions for suicide do not exist, and those in federal and state legislation vary dramatically. These inconsistencies contribute to confusion and a lack of consensus about the magnitude of the problem. CDC is convening an expert panel to review the existing state of suicide surveillance and to recommend definitions to use during data collection. Acquiring better data about suicide will shape prevention efforts and provide valuable insight to help decision makers and communities make informed public health decisions for allocating prevention resources. Contact: Etiology and Surveillance Branch 770-488-4410 ohcinfo@cdc.gov


National Electronic Injury Surveillance System – Suicide com Prevention

National Electronic Injury Surveillance System – All Injury Program The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System – All Injury Program (NEISS-AIP) is operated by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission in collaboration with the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. It provides nationally representative data about all types and causes of nonfatal injuries treated in U.S. hospital emergency departments. CDC uses NEISS-AIP data to generate national estimates of nonfatal injuries, including those related to suicide. Contact: Etiology and Surveillance Branch 770-488-4410 ohcinfo@cdc.gov Core Injury Surveillance and Program Development CDC’s Core Injury Surveillance and Program Development project supports state health departments to integrate basic violent injury surveillance into existing injury surveillance systems. The project also supports the collection of standardized indicators for various types of violence. Contact: Etiology and Surveillance Branch 770-488-4410 ohcinfo@cdc.gov


Violence Links – Suicide com Prevention

Assessing Links Between Various Forms of Violence CDC is conducting a study to identify the links between different forms of violent behaviors among adolescents, including suicide. The study will help scientists gain an understanding of the prevalence and consequences of different types of aggressive behaviors and the association between dating violence and other forms of peer violence and how they vary by sex, developmental stage, and other factors. Contact: Etiology and Surveillance Branch 770-488-4410 ohcinfo@cdc.gov Supporting and Enhancing Prevention Programs


Preventing Violence through Education – Suicide com Prevention

Preventing Violence through Education, Networking and Technical Assistance CDC is funding the University of North Carolina Injury Prevention Research Center to develop a national training program for violence prevention practitioners. Preventing Violence through Education, Networking and Technical Assistance (PREVENT) works with individuals and organizations to build skills for identifying community needs and assets, creating and mobilizing partnerships, developing and implementing prevention programs, measuring success, and for funding and sustaining programs. Contact: www.prevent.unc.edu 919-966-2251 prevent@unc.edu


Address Child and Adolescent Health through Violence prevention – Suicide com Prevention

Enhancing State Capacity to Address Child and Adolescent Health Through Violence Prevention (ESCAPe) CDC’s ESCAPe program is designed to develop capacity and leadership in preventing violence toward and among children and adolescents, including youth suicide, child maltreatment, teen dating violence, bullying, and sexual, school, and community violence. The planning and implementation phases of this project will address the intersection of shared risk and protective factors for these forms of violence. Colorado, Iowa, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Mexico, Rhode Island, and Virginia have been funded to conduct the program. Contact: Program Implementation and Dissemination Branch 770-488-1424 ohcinfo@cdc.gov


National Strategy for Suicide Prevention – Suicide com Prevention

Federal Steering Group for the National Strategy for Suicide Prevention CDC plays a key role in the Federal Steering Group for the National Strategy for Suicide Prevention. This Group provides recommendations and guidance for implementing the National Strategy; coordinates federal initiatives to prevent suicide; and collaborates with federal and non-federal partners to advance Strategy goals and objectives, which were published early 2001. They included promoting awareness about suicide as a preventable public health problem; developing and evaluating prevention programs; improving the portrayal of suicide, mental health, and drug use in the entertainment and news media; promoting research about suicide and School-Associated Violent Deaths Study In partnership with the Departments of Education and Justice, CDC has conducted a national study of school-associated violent deaths since 1992. This ongoing study plays an important role in monitoring trends in school-associated violent deaths; identifying risk factors; and in assessing the effects of prevention efforts. Contact: Etiology and Surveillance Branch 770-488-4410 ohcinfo@cdc.gov


Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System – Suicide com Prevention

Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System CDC’s Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) is designed to monitor priority health risk behaviors that contribute to the leading causes of death, disability, social problems, and unintentional injuries and violence among youth and adults in the United States. The YRBSS consists of national, state, and local school-based surveys of representative samples of 9th through 12th grade students. The surveys are conducted biennially and provide information about a variety of suicide and interpersonal violence-related behaviors both on school property and in the community. Contact: Division of Adolescent and School Health 1-888-231-6405 healthyyouth@cdc.gov its prevention; and enhancing tracking systems for suicide. Contact: Etiology and Surveillance Branch 770-488-4410 ohcinfo@cdc.gov


State Injury Prevention Program Implementation and Evaluation – Suicide com Prevention

CDC is funding the state injury prevention programs in Maine and Virginia to implement and evaluate strategic plans for suicide prevention. These plans were developed through state coalitions. Contact: Program Implementation and Dissemination Branch 770-488-1424 ohcinfo@cdc.gov Providing Prevention Resources National Youth Violence Prevention Resource Center In January 2001, CDC launched a Web-based resource for those interested in preventing youth violence and suicide. The National Youth Violence Prevention Resource Center serves as a central source for information and materials gathered from institutions, community-based organizations, and federal agencies working to prevent violence among our nation’s youth. The Center’s Website, toll-free hotline, and fax-on-demand service offer access to prevention information, publications, research and statistics, and fact sheets. The Website links parents, teens, and researchers to materials designed specifically for them. Each month, the Center hosts more than 37,000 Website visitors; fulfills more than 500 requests for publications and youth violence prevention materials; and responds to more than 100 public inquiries and requests for technical assistance. Contact: www.safeyouth.org 1-866-SAFEYOUTH


School Health Guidelines to Prevent Violence – Suicide com Prevention

School Health Guidelines to Prevent Unintentional Injuries and Violence The School Health Guidelines to Prevent Unintentional Injuries and Violence help state and local educational agencies and schools promote safety and teach students the skills they need to prevent injuries and violence. They provide guidance for every component of a coordinated school health program for all grade levels. The Guidelines were developed by CDC in collaboration with specialists from universities and from national, federal, state, and local agencies and organizations. This guidance is based on an in-depth review of research, theory, and current practice in unintentional injury, violence, and suicide prevention; health education; and public health. The Guidelines are available at www.cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/injury/guidelines/ index.htm. Contact: Division of Adolescent and School Health 1-888-231-6405 healthyyouth@cdc.gov


Multi-state Assessment of State Suicide Prevention Planning – Suicide com Prevention

CDC is conducting an in-depth, multi-state examination of the development and implementation of state suicide prevention plans. The findings will help other states gain stakeholder support to develop plans that can be put into practice. Insights gleaned from this study will help inform state-based prevention efforts in other public health problem areas such as violence against women and child maltreatment. Contact: Program Implementation and Dissemination Branch 770-488-1424 ohcinfo@cdc.gov


Encouraging Research and Development – Suicide com Prevention

CDC’s extramural research program funds and monitors varied research on violence and injury prevention. Suicide Risk During Transition to Early Adulthood Researchers at the University of Washington’s School of Nursing are conducting a study to assess suicide risk during the transitional period from late adolescence to early adulthood. They will also examine the long-term effectiveness of a suicide prevention program. Jerry R. Herting, PhD 206-616-6478


Intentional Injury Among Urban Youth – Suicide com Prevention

Harvard University’s Center for Injury Research and Control is conducting a study to increase understanding of the risk factors and prevalence of intentional injury among urban youth. The project involves 6,000 youth residing in 80 Chicago neighborhoods. David Hemenway, PhD 617-432-4493 Child Violence, Adult Victimization, Injury, and Health The Medical University of South Carolina is examining the effects of violent assault histories and adverse family environments on leading health indicators such as violence-related injury, suicidal behavior, tobacco use, substance abuse, mental health problems, and risky sexual behavior. Dean Kilpatrick, PhD 843-792-2945


Family Intervention for Suicidal Youth: Emergency Care – Suicide com Prevention

Researchers from the University of California are evaluating a family-focused suicide prevention intervention for adolescents who attempt suicide and are treated in the hospital emergency department. Joan Asarnow, PhD 310-825-0408 Help Seeking by At-Risk Youth After Suicide Screenings Researchers from the Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene are conducting a study of youth identified by screening programs as at-risk for suicidal behavior. The study will assess participants two years after initial screening for service use, barriers to treatment, and changes to risk status. Madelyn S. Gould, PhD, MPH 212-543-5329


Suicide Prevention – Suicide com Prevention

Suicide Prevention in a Primary Care Setting Researchers from the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia are testing the efficacy of brief family therapy for adolescents presenting with serious risk for suicide in a primary care setting. Guy Diamond, PhD 215-590-1000


Community-Based Cognitive Therapy – Suicide com Prevention

Community-Based Cognitive Therapy for Suicide Attempters CDC is funding the University of Pennsylvania to determine the efficacy and effectiveness of a cognitive therapy intervention for suicide attempters. The intervention is designed to prevent subsequent suicide attempts and to increase compliance with psychiatric, substance abuse, and medical treatment. Aaron T. Beck, MD 215-898-4102


Improving Firearm Storage Practices – Suicide com Prevention

Improving Firearm Storage Practices in Alaska Native Villages Researchers from the Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center are testing an intervention to improve firearm storage among residents of Alaska Native villages. Safe storage practices may be a promising strategy to reduce the risk of suicide in this population. Frederick Rivara, MD, MPH 205-521-1530


More Information – Suicide com Prevention

For more information or additional copies of this document, please contact: For more information or additional copies of this document, please contact: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Injury Prevention and Control 4770 Buford Highway NE Mail Stop K-65 Atlanta, GA 30341 Telephone: (770) 488-1506 Fax: (770) 488-1667 E-mail: ohcinfo@cdc.gov Website: www.cdc.gov/injury

Content Provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Suicide Facts at a Glance

Fatal Suicidal Behavior – Suicide Rate


  • In 2004, suicide was the eleventh leading cause of death for all ages (CDC 2005).
  • Suicides accounted for 1.4% of all deaths in the U.S. (CDC 2005).
  • More than 32,000 suicides occurred in the U.S. This is the equivalent of 89 suicides per day; one suicide every 16 minutes or 11.05 suicides per 100,000 population (CDC 2005).
  • The National Violent Death Reporting System examined toxicology tests of those who committed suicide in 13 states: 33.3% tested positive for alcohol; 16.4% for opiates; 9.4% for cocaine; 7.7% for marijuana; and 3.9% for amphetamines (Karch et al. 2006).


Racial and Ethnic Disparities Gender Disparities – Suicide Rate

  • Males take their own lives at nearly four times the rate of females and represent 78.8% of all U.S. suicides (CDC 2005).
  • During their lifetime, women attempt suicide about two to three times as often as men (Krug et al. 2002).
  • Suicide is the eighth leading cause of death for males and the sixteenth leading cause for females (CDC 2005).
  • Among males, adults ages 75 years and older have the highest rate of suicide (rate 37.4 per 100,000 population) (CDC 2005).
  • Among females, those in their 40s and 50s have the highest rate of suicide (rate 8.0 per 100,000 population) (CDC 2005).
  • Firearms are the most commonly used method of suicide among males (56.8%) (CDC 2005).
  • Poisoning is the most common method of suicide for females (37.8%) (CDC 2005).
  • Among young adults ages 15 to 24 years old, there is 1 suicide for every 100-200 attempts (Goldsmith et al. 2002).
  • Among adults ages 65 years and older, there is 1 suicide for every 4 suicide attempts (Goldsmith et al. 2002).
  • In 2005, 16.9% of U.S. high school students reported that they had seriously considered attempting suicide during the 12 months preceding the survey. More than 8% of students reported that they had actually attempted suicide one or more times during the same period (Eaton et al. 2006).


Nonfatal Suicidal Thoughts and Behavior – Suicide Rate

  • Among American Indians/Alaska Natives ages 15- to 34-years, suicide is the second leading cause of death (CDC 2005).
  • Suicide rates among American Indian/Alaskan Native adolescents and young adults ages 15 to 34 (21.4 per 100,000) are 1.9 times higher than the national average for that age group (11.5 per 100,000). (CDC 2005).
  • Hispanic female high school students in grades 9-12 reported a higher percentage of suicide attempts (14.9%) than their White, non-Hispanic (9.3%) or Black, non-Hispanic (9.8%) counterparts. (Eaton et al. 2006).


Suicide Facts At A Glance More Information – Suicide Rate

For more information, please contact: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Injury Prevention and Control 1-800-CDC-INFO, www.cdc.gov/injury, cdcinfo@cdc.gov 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS) [Online]. (2005). National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC (producer). Available from URL: www.cdc.gov/ ncipc/wisqars/default.htm. 2. Karch D, Crosby A, Simon T. Toxicology testing and results for suicide victims—13 States, 2004. MMWR 2006; 55:1245-8. 3. Eaton DK, Kann L, Kinchen SA, Ross JG, Hawkins J, Harris WA, et al. Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2005. MMWR 2006; 55(No. SS-5):1-108. 4. Goldsmith SK, Pellmar TC, Kleinman AM, Bunney WE, editors. Reducing suicide: a national imperative. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 2002. 5. Krug EG, Dahlberg LL, Mercy JA, Zwi A, Lozano R, editors. World report on violence and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. 6. McCaig LF, Nawar EN. National hospital ambulatory medical care survey: 2004 emergency department summary. Advance data from vital and health statistics. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for


Nonfatal, Self-Inflicted Injuries – Suicide Rate

  • In 2005, 372,722 people were treated in emergency departments for self-inflicted injuries (McCaig 2006).
  • In 2005, 154,598 people were hospitalized due to selfinflicted injury (CDC 2005).
  • There is one suicide for every 25 attempted suicides (Goldsmith et al. 2002).


Suicide-Related Behaviors among U.S. High School Students – Suicide Rate

In 2005

  • 16.9% of students, grade 9-12, seriously considered suicide in the previous 12 months (21.8% of females and 12.0% of males) (Eaton et al. 2006).
  • 8.4% of students reported making at least one suicide attempt in the previous 12 months (10.8% of females and 6.0% of males) (Eaton et al. 2006).
  • 2.3% of students reported making at least one suicide attempt in the previous 12 months that required medical attention (2.9% of females and 1.8% of males) (Eaton et al. 2006).


References – Suicide Rate

  • Suicide is the second leading cause of death among 25-34 year olds and the third leading cause of death among 15- and 24-year olds (CDC 2005).
  • Among 15- to 24-year olds, suicide accounts for 12.9% of all deaths annually (CDC 2005).
  • The rate of suicide for adults aged 65 years and older was 14.3 per 100,000 (CDC 2005).


Age Group Differences – Suicide Rate

The term “self-inflicted injuries” refers to suicidal and non-suicidal behaviors such as self-mutilation.

Content Provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Self-inflicted Injury/Suicide

Health Care Use – Online Suicide Statistics


Number of emergency department visits for self-inflicted injury: 420,000


National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey – Online Suicide Statistics

Source: National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2005 Emergency Department Summary, Table 14


Mortality All suicides – Online Suicide Statistics

Number of deaths: 32,637


Population Deaths – Online Suicide Statistics

Deaths per 100,000 population: 11.0


Firearm suicides – Online Suicide Statistics

Number of deaths: 17,002


Population Deaths – Online Suicide Statistics

Deaths per 100,000 population: 5.7


Suffocation suicides – Online Suicide Statistics

Number of deaths: 7,248


Population Deaths – Online Suicide Statistics

Deaths per 100,000 population: 2.4


Poisoning suicides – Online Suicide Statistics

Number of deaths: 5,744


Population Deaths – Online Suicide Statistics

Deaths per 100,000 population: 1.9


Final Suicide Death Count – Online Suicide Statistics

Source: Deaths: Final Data for 2005, Table 18

Content Provided by the National Center for Health Statistics

Antidepressant Medications for Children and Adolescents: Information for Parents and Caregivers

Antidepressants and Suicidal Behavior – How to Suicide Prevention

Depression is a serious disorder that can cause significant problems in mood, thinking, and behavior at home, in school, and with peers. It is estimated that major depressive disorder (MDD) affects about 5 percent of adolescents.


Depression in Children is Treatable – How to Suicide Prevention

Research has shown that, as in adults, depression in children and adolescents is treatable. Certain antidepressant medications, called selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), can be beneficial to children and adolescents with MDD. Certain types of psychological therapies also have been shown to be effective. However, our knowledge of antidepressant treatments in youth, though growing substantially, is limited compared to what we know about treating depression in adults.


Antidepressants Induce Suicidal Behavior in Youths – How to Suicide Prevention

Recently, there has been some concern that the use of antidepressant medications themselves may induce suicidal behavior in youths. Following a thorough and comprehensive review of all the available published and unpublished controlled clinical trials of antidepressants in children and adolescents, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a public warning in October 2004 about an increased risk of suicidal thoughts or behavior (suicidality) in children and adolescents treated with SSRI antidepressant medications. In 2006, an advisory committee to the FDA recommended that the agency extend the warning to include young adults up to age 25.


Review of Pediatric Trials – How to Suicide Prevention

More recently, results of a comprehensive review of pediatric trials conducted between 1988 and 2006 suggested that the benefits of antidepressant medications likely outweigh their risks to children and adolescents with major depression and anxiety disorders. The study, partially funded by NIMH, was published in the April 18, 2007, issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.1 What Did the FDA Review Find?


FDA Review – How to Suicide Prevention

In the FDA review, no completed suicides occurred among nearly 2,200 children treated with SSRI medications. However, about 4 percent of those taking SSRI medications experienced suicidal thinking or behavior, including actual suicide attempts—twice the rate of those taking placebo, or sugar pills.


“Black Box” Label – How to Suicide Prevention

In response, the FDA adopted a “black box” label warning indicating that antidepressants may increase the risk of suicidal thinking and behavior in some children and adolescents with MDD. A black-box warning is the most serious type of warning in prescription drug labeling.


Medication Warnings – How to Suicide Prevention

The warning also notes that children and adolescents taking SSRI medications should be closely monitored for any worsening in depression, emergence of suicidal thinking or behavior, or unusual changes in behavior, such as sleeplessness, agitation, or withdrawal from normal social situations. Close monitoring is especially important during the first four weeks of treatment. SSRI medications usually have few side effects in children and adolescents, but for unknown reasons, they may trigger agitation and abnormal behavior in certain individuals. What Do We Know About Antidepressant Medications?


SSRI – How to Suicide Prevention

The SSRIs include:

  • fluoxetine (Prozac)
  • sertraline (Zoloft)
  • paroxetine (Paxil)
  • citalopram (Celexa)
  • escitalopram (Lexapro)
  • fluvoxamine (Luvox)

Another antidepressant medication, venlafaxine (Effexor), is not an SSRI but is closely related.


SSRI Medications – How to Suicide Prevention

SSRI medications are considered an improvement over older antidepressant medications because they have fewer side effects and are less likely to be harmful if taken in an overdose, which is an issue for patients with depression already at risk for suicide. They have been shown to be safe and effective for adults.


Usage Risen Dramatically – How to Suicide Prevention

However, use of SSRI medications among children and adolescents ages 10 to 19 has risen dramatically in the past several years. Fluoxetine (Prozac) is the only medication approved by the FDA for use in treating depression in children ages 8 and older. The other SSRI medications and the SSRI-related antidepressant venlafaxine have not been approved for treatment of depression in children or adolescents, but doctors still sometimes prescribe them to children on an “off-label” basis. In June 2003, however, the FDA recommended that paroxetine not be used in children and adolescents for treating MDD.


Fluoxetine Helpful for Children – How to Suicide Prevention

Fluoxetine can be helpful in treating childhood depression, and can lead to significant improvement of depression overall. However, it may increase the risk for suicidal behaviors in a small subset of adolescents. As with all medical decisions, doctors and families should weigh the risks and benefits of treatment for each individual patient. What Should You Do for a Child With Depression?


Children with MDD – How to Suicide Prevention

A child or adolescent with MDD should be carefully and thoroughly evaluated by a doctor to determine if medication is appropriate. Psychotherapy often is tried as an initial treatment for mild depression. Psychotherapy may help to determine the severity and persistence of the depression and whether antidepressant medications may be warranted. Types of psychotherapies include “cognitive behavioral therapy,” which helps people learn new ways of thinking and behaving, and “interpersonal therapy,” which helps people understand and work through troubled personal relationships.


Ongoing Medical Monitoring – How to Suicide Prevention

Those who are prescribed an SSRI medication should receive ongoing medical monitoring. Children already taking an SSRI medication should remain on the medication if it has been helpful, but should be carefully monitored by a doctor for side effects. Parents should promptly seek medical advice and evaluation if their child or adolescent experiences suicidal thinking or behavior, nervousness, agitation, irritability, mood instability, or sleeplessness that either emerges or worsens during treatment with SSRI medications.


Treatment Ending – How to Suicide Prevention

Once started, treatment with these medications should not be abruptly stopped. Although they are not habit-forming or addictive, abruptly ending an antidepressant can cause withdrawal symptoms or lead to a relapse. Families should not discontinue treatment without consulting their doctor.


Treatment Side Effects – How to Suicide Prevention

All treatments can be associated with side effects. Families and doctors should carefully weigh the risks and benefits, and maintain appropriate follow-up and monitoring to help control for the risks. What Does Research Tell Us?


Individual’s Response to Medication – How to Suicide Prevention

An individual’s response to a medication cannot be predicted with certainty. It is extremely difficult to determine whether SSRI medications increase the risk for completed suicide, especially because depression itself increases the risk for suicide and because completed suicides, especially among children and adolescents, are rare. Most controlled trials are too small to detect for rare events such as suicide (thousands of participants are needed). In addition, controlled trials typically exclude patients considered at high risk for suicide.


Clinical Trial Results – How to Suicide Prevention

One major clinical trial, the NIMH-funded Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS)2, has indicated that a combination of medication and psychotherapy is the most effective treatment for adolescents with depression. The clinical trial of 439 adolescents ages 12 to 17 with MDD compared four treatment groups—one that received a combination of fluoxetine and CBT, one that received fluoxetine only, one that received CBT only, and one that received a placebo only. After the first 12 weeks, 71 percent responded to the combination treatment of fluoxetine and CBT, 61 percent responded to the fluoxetine only treatment, 43 percent responded to the CBT only treatment, and 35 percent responded to the placebo treatment.


Study Foreground – How to Suicide Prevention

At the beginning of the study, 29 percent of the TADS participants were having clinically significant suicidal thoughts. Although the rate of suicidal thinking decreased among all the treatment groups, those in the fluoxetine/CBT combination treatment group showed the greatest reduction in suicidal thinking.


Relationship between Antidepressants and Suicide – How to Suicide Prevention

Researchers are working to better understand the relationship between antidepressant medications and suicide. So far, results are mixed. One study, using national Medicaid files, found that among adults, the use of antidepressants does not seem to be related to suicide attempts or deaths. However, the analysis found that the use of antidepressant medications may be related to suicide attempts and deaths among children and adolescents.3


Healthcare Records Study – How to Suicide Prevention

Another study analyzed health plan records for 65,103 patients treated for depression.4 It found no significant increase among adults and young people in the risk for suicide after starting treatment with newer antidepressant medications.


National Vital Statistics Study – How to Suicide Prevention

A third study analyzed suicide data from the National Vital Statistics and commercial prescription data. It found that among children ages five to 14, suicide rates from 1996 to 1998 were actually lower in areas of the country with higher rates of SSRI antidepressant prescriptions. The relationship between the suicide rates and the SSRI use rates, however, is unclear.5


New Research – How to Suicide Prevention

New NIMH-funded research will help clarify the complex interplay between suicide and antidepressant medications. In addition, the NIMH-funded Treatment of Resistant Depression in Adolescents (TORDIA) study, will investigate how best to treat adolescents whose depression is resistant to the first SSRI medication they have tried. Finally, NIMH also is supporting the Treatment of Adolescent Suicide Attempters (TASA) study, which is investigating the treatment of adolescents who have attempted suicide. Treatments include antidepressant medications, CBT or both.


Complete list of all NIMH Clinical Trials – How to Suicide Prevention

  • 1. Bridge JA, Iyengar S, Salary CB, Barbe RP, Birmaher B, Pincus HA, Ren L, Brent DA, MD. Clinical Response and Risk for Reported Suicidal Ideation and Suicide Attempts in Pediatric Antidepressant Treatment: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. JAMA. 2007;297:1683-1696.
  • 2. Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS) Team. Fluoxetine, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and their combination for adolescents with depression: Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study (TADS) randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 2004 Aug 18; 292(7):807-20.
  • 3. Olfson M, Marcus SC, Shaffer D. Antidepressant Drug Therapy and Suicide in Severely Depressed Children and Adults. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2006 Aug. 63:865-72
  • 4. Simon GE, Savarino J, Operskalski B, Wang P. Suicide Risk During Antidepressant Treatment. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2006. 163 (1): 41-47.
  • 5. Gibbons RD, Hur K, Bhaumik DK, Mann JJ. The relationships between antidepressant prescription rates and rate of early adolescent suicide. American Journal of Psychiatry 2006. 163 (11): 1898-1904
  • Content Provided by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Suicide Warning Signs

Keywords:

Seek help as soon as possible by contacting a mental health professional or by calling the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 1-800-273-TALK if you or someone you know exhibits any of the following signs:

  • Threatening to hurt or kill oneself or talking about wanting to hurt or kill oneself
  • Looking for ways to kill oneself by seeking access to firearms, pills, or other means
  • Talking or writing about death, dying, or suicide when these actions are out of the ordinary for the person
  • Feeling hopeless
  • Feeling rage or uncontrolled anger or seeking revenge
  • Acting reckless or engaging in risky activities – seemingly without thinking
  • Feeling trapped-like there’s no way out
  • Increasing alcohol or drug use
  • Withdrawing from friends, family, and society
  • Feeling anxious, agitated, or unable to sleep or sleeping all the time
  • Experiencing dramatic mood changes
  • Seeing no reason for living or having no sense of purpose in life

Content Provide by the U.S. National Health Information Center

Suicide in the U.S.: Statistics and Prevention

Keywords:

Suicide is a major, preventable public health problem. In 2004, it was the eleventh leading cause of death in the U.S., accounting for 32,439 deaths.1 The overall rate was 10.9 suicide deaths per 100,000 people.1 An estimated eight to 25 attempted suicides occur per every suicide death.2

Suicidal behavior is complex. Some risk factors vary with age, gender, or ethnic group and may occur in combination or change over time. If you are in a crisis and need help right away:

Call this toll-free number, available 24 hours a day, every day: 1-800-273-TALK (8255). You will reach the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline, a service available to anyone. You may call for yourself or for someone you care about. All calls are confidential. What are the risk factors for suicide?

Research shows that risk factors for suicide include:

  • depression and other mental disorders, or a substance-abuse disorder (often in combination with other mental disorders). More than 90 percent of people who die by suicide have these risk factors.2
  • stressful life events, in combination with other risk factors, such as depression. However, suicide and suicidal behavior are not normal responses to stress; many people have these risk factors, but are not suicidal.
  • prior suicide attempt
  • family history of mental disorder or substance abuse
  • family history of suicide
  • family violence, including physical or sexual abuse
  • firearms in the home,3 the method used in more than half of suicides
  • incarceration
  • exposure to the suicidal behavior of others, such as family members, peers, or media figures.2

Research also shows that the risk for suicide is associated with changes in brain chemicals called neurotransmitters, including serotonin. Decreased levels of serotonin have been found in people with depression, impulsive disorders, and a history of suicide attempts, and in the brains of suicide victims. 4 Are women or men at higher risk?

  • Suicide was the eighth leading cause of death for males and the sixteenth leading cause of death for females in 2004.1
  • Almost four times as many males as females die by suicide.1
  • Firearms, suffocation, and poison are by far the most common methods of suicide, overall. However, men and women differ in the method used, as shown below.1

Suicide by: Males () Females () Firearms 57 32 Suffocation 23 20 Poisoning 13 38 Is suicide common among children and young people?

In 2004, suicide was the third leading cause of death in each of the following age groups.1 Of every 100,000 young people in each age group, the following number died by suicide:1

  • Children ages 10 to 14 — 1.3 per 100,000
  • Adolescents ages 15 to 19 — 8.2 per 100,000
  • Young adults ages 20 to 24 — 12.5 per 100,000

As in the general population, young people were much more likely to use firearms, suffocation, and poisoning than other methods of suicide, overall. However, while adolescents and young adults were more likely to use firearms than suffocation, children were dramatically more likely to use suffocation.1

There were also gender differences in suicide among young people, as follows:

  • Almost four times as many males as females ages 15 to 19 died by suicide.1
  • More than six times as many males as females ages 20 to 24 died by suicide.1

Are older adults at risk?

Older Americans are disproportionately likely to die by suicide.

  • Of every 100,000 people ages 65 and older, 14.3 died by suicide in 2004. This figure is higher than the national average of 10.9 suicides per 100,000 people in the general population. 1
  • Non-Hispanic white men age 85 or older had an even higher rate, with 17.8 suicide deaths per 100,000.1

Are Some Ethnic Groups or Races at Higher Risk?

Of every 100,000 people in each of the following ethnic/racial groups below, the following number died by suicide in 2004.1

  • Highest rates: o Non-Hispanic Whites — 12.9 per 100,000 o American Indian and Alaska Natives — 12.4 per 100,000
  • Lowest rates: o Non-Hispanic Blacks — 5.3 per 100,000 o Asian and Pacific Islanders — 5.8 per 100,000 o Hispanics — 5.9 per 100,000

What are some risk factors for nonfatal suicide attempts?

  • As noted, an estimated eight to 25 nonfatal suicide attempts occur per every suicide death. Men and the elderly are more likely to have fatal attempts than are women and youth.2
  • Risk factors for nonfatal suicide attempts by adults include depression and other mental disorders, alcohol abuse, cocaine use, and separation or divorce.5,6
  • Risk factors for attempted suicide by youth include depression, alcohol or other drug-use disorder, physical or sexual abuse, and disruptive behavior.6,7
  • Most suicide attempts are expressions of extreme distress, not harmless bids for attention. A person who appears suicidal should not be left alone and needs immediate mental-health treatment.

What can be done to prevent suicide?

Research helps determine which factors can be modified to help prevent suicide and which interventions are appropriate for specific groups of people. Before being put into practice, prevention programs should be tested through research to determine their safety and effectiveness.8 For example, because research has shown that mental and substance-abuse disorders are major risk factors for suicide, many programs also focus on treating these disorders.

Studies showed that a type of psychotherapy called cognitive therapy reduced the rate of repeated suicide attempts by 50 percent during a year of follow-up. A previous suicide attempt is among the strongest predictors of subsequent suicide, and cognitive therapy helps suicide attempters consider alternative actions when thoughts of self-harm arise.9

Specific kinds of psychotherapy may be helpful for specific groups of people. For example, a recent study showed that a treatment called dialectical behavior therapy reduced suicide attempts by half, compared with other kinds of therapy, in people with borderline personality disorder (a serious disorder of emotion regulation).10

The medication clozapine is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for suicide prevention in people with schizophrenia.11 Other promising medications and psychosocial treatments for suicidal people are being tested.

Since research shows that older adults and women who die by suicide are likely to have seen a primary care provider in the year before death, improving primary-care providers’ ability to recognize and treat risk factors may help prevent suicide among these groups.12 Improving outreach to men at risk is a major challenge in need of investigation. What should I do if I think someone is suicidal?

If you think someone is suicidal, do not leave him or her alone. Try to get the person to seek immediate help from his or her doctor or the nearest hospital emergency room, or call 911. Eliminate access to firearms or other potential tools for suicide, including unsupervised access to medications. For More Information About Suicide

Suicide Information and Organizations from NLM’s MedlinePlus (en Español) References

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS) : www.cdc.gov/ncipc/wisqars

2. Moscicki EK. Epidemiology of completed and attempted suicide: toward a framework for prevention. Clinical Neuroscience Research, 2001; 1: 310-23.

3. Miller M, Azrael D, Hepburn L, Hemenway D, Lippmann SJ. The association between changes in household firearm ownership and rates of suicide in the United States, 1981-2002. Injury Prevention 2006;12:178-182; doi:10.1136/ip.2005.010850

4. Arango V, Huang YY, Underwood MD, Mann JJ. Genetics of the serotonergic system in suicidal behavior. Journal of Psychiatric Research. Vol. 37: 375-386. 2003.

5. Kessler RC, Borges G, Walters EE. Prevalence of and risk factors for lifetime suicide attempts in the National Comorbidity Survey. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1999; 56(7): 617-26.

6. Petronis KR, Samuels JF, Moscicki EK, Anthony JC. An epidemiologic investigation of potential risk factors for suicide attempts. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 1990; 25(4): 193-9.

7. U.S. Public Health Service. National strategy for suicide prevention: goals and objectives for action. Rockville, MD: USDHHS, 2001.

8. Gould MS, Greenberg T, Velting DM, Shaffer D. Youth suicide risk and preventive interventions: a review of the past 10 years. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2003; 42(4): 386-405.

9. Brown GK, Ten Have T, Henriques GR, Xie SX, Hollander JE, Beck AT. Cognitive therapy for the prevention of suicide attempts: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association . 2005 Aug 3;294(5):563-70.

10. Linehan MM, Comtois KA, Murray AM, Brown MZ, Gallop RJ, Heard HL, Korslund KE, Tutek DA, Reynolds SK, Lindenboim N. Two-Year Randomized Controlled Trial and Follow-up of Dialectical Behavior Therapy vs Therapy by Experts for Suicidal Behaviors and Borderline Personality Disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 2006 Jul;63(7):757-766.

11. Meltzer HY, Alphs L, Green AI, Altamura AC, Anand R, Bertoldi A, Bourgeois M, Chouinard G, Islam MZ, Kane J, Krishnan R, Lindenmayer JP, Potkin S; International Suicide Prevention Trial Study Group. Clozapine treatment for suicidality in schizophrenia: International Suicide Prevention Trial (InterSePT). Archives of General Psychiatry, 2003; 60(1): 82-91.

12. Luoma JB, Pearson JL, Martin CE. Contact with mental health and primary care prior to suicide: a review of the evidence. American Journal of Psychiatry, 2002; 159: 909-16.

Content Provided by the U.S. National Institute of Mental Health

Suicide Basics

Keywords:

Suicide is the eleventh most common cause of death in the United States. People may consider suicide when they are hopeless and can’t see any other solution to their problems. Often it’s related to serious depression, alcohol or substance abuse, or a major stressful event.

People who have the highest risk of suicide are white men, though women and teens report more suicide attempts. If someone talks about suicide, you should take it seriously. Urge them to get help from their doctor or the emergency room, or call 911.

Therapy and medicines can help most people who have suicidal thoughts. Treating mental illnesses and substance abuse can reduce the risk of suicide.

Content Provided by the National Institute of Mental Health

Know the Warning Signs-Prevent Suicide in Young People

Keywords:

Suicide is a serious problem among young people. You may be surprised to learn that it is the third leading cause of death for 15- to 19-year-olds in the United States. Only accidents and homicide are more common causes of death for this age group1. A far greater number of youths attempt suicide each year. Suicide attempts are not easy to count because many may not be treated in a hospital or may not be recorded as self-inflicted injuries. Survey data from 2005 show that 17 percent of high school students had seriously thought about suicide, 13 percent had made plans to attempt suicide, and more than 8 percent had made a suicide attempt during the year before the survey.2

Suicidal behavior is different among young women than among young men. Young women attempt suicide three times more often than young men. However, four times more young men than young women actually die from suicide3. This may be because females and males tend to use different methods when attempting suicide. Young women often attempt suicide by overdosing on drugs or cutting themselves-methods which offer more opportunities for rescue. Young men often use firearms, hanging, or jumping from heights-methods which usually cause instant death and offer no chance to intervene4. Suicide among young white men accounts for most suicide deaths, but the suicide rate among young black men is rising. Suicide rates for American Indians aged 15 to 19 are high (19 percent of deaths) compared to overall rates for this age group (less than 13 percent of deaths).5

Risk Factors

Most youths who attempt suicide are experiencing a psychological problem such as depression or bipolar disorder, a substance abuse problem, or both6. A teen’s experiences and history also can increase the chance that he will attempt suicide. For instance, he has a greater risk of attempting suicide if his family has a history of suicide, if he has previously harmed himself or attempted suicide, or if he has run away. A young person also may attempt suicide in response to an extremely stressful event, loss, or conflict with another person.7

Warning Signs

Most youths who attempt suicide show some warning signs beforehand. Look for signs of substance abuse or depression and get professional help for your child if she needs it: Mentalhealth and Treatment.

Here are some other possible signals of suicide to watch out for:8 9 10 11

Words

  • Talks, writes, or otherwise expresses a preoccupation with suicide or death in general.
  • Complains of being a bad person or being “rotten inside.”
  • Gives verbal hints such as, “I’d be better off dead,” “I won’t be a problem for you much longer,” “Nothing matters,” “It’s no use,” and “I won’t see you again.”

Actions

  • Withdraws from friends or family.
  • Significantly changes eating, sleeping, or appearance habits.
  • Experiences sudden drop in academic performance.
  • Puts his affairs in order; for example, gives away favorite toys, cleans his room, or throws away important belongings.
  • Acts in rash, hostile, or irrational ways; often expresses rage.

Feelings

  • Feels overwhelmingly hopeless, guilty, or ashamed.
  • Shows little interest in favorite activities or the future.
  • Becomes suddenly cheerful after a period of depression (perhaps feeling that she’s found a “solution” to her problems).

A suicide of a schoolmate, friend, or even a celebrity receiving media coverage can encourage suicidal impulses in your child. Suicides sometimes occur in clusters, in which one suicide influences other people already at risk for suicide.12

What To Do

If your child seems constantly depressed, angry, or withdrawn, pay attention and encourage communication. If you are worried that he’s thinking about hurting or killing himself, ask, even though it may be difficult. Rather than putting dangerous thoughts into his head, asking shows him that you care and that he is not alone.13 If you are concerned about your child’s safety, do not leave him alone. Most important, take seriously any suicide attempt. If your child or someone else you know is thinking about suicide, call 1-800-273-TALK (8255) to find a crisis center in your area.

Sources

Additional Resources

  • National Suicide Prevention Lifeline
  • Mental Health America
  • National Alliance on Mental Illness
  • TeensHealth: Suicide (Nemours Foundation)
  • Suicide Prevention Resource Center
  • SPAN USA-Suicide Prevention Action Network USA

Factoid

Over the 20 years from 1979 through 1998, the suicide rate for youth ages 10 to14 increased by over 100 percent and by six percent for teens aged 15 to 19.

(Goldrick, L. Youth suicide prevention: Strengthening state policies and school-based strategies, last referenced 8/17/07.)

Content Provided by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Other Mental Disorders in Children and Adolescents

Keywords:

Anxiety Disorders

The combined prevalence of the group of disorders known as anxiety disorders is higher than that of virtually all other mental disorders of childhood and adolescence (Costello et al., 1996). The 1-year prevalence in children ages 9 to 17 is 13 percent (Table 3-1). This section furnishes brief overviews of several anxiety disorders: separation anxiety disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Treatments for all but the latter are grouped together below.

Separation Anxiety Disorder Although separation anxieties are normal among infants and toddlers, they are not appropriate for older children or adolescents and may represent symptoms of separation anxiety disorder. To reach the diagnostic threshold for this disorder, the anxiety or fear must cause distress or affect social, academic, or job functioning and must last at least 1 month (DSM-IV). Children with separation anxiety may cling to their parent and have difficulty falling asleep by themselves at night. When separated, they may fear that their parent will be involved in an accident or taken ill, or in some other way be“lost” to the child forever. Their need to stay close to their parent or home may make it difficult for them to attend school or camp, stay at friends’ houses, or be in a room by themselves. Fear of separation can lead to dizziness, nausea, or palpitations (DSM-IV).

Separation anxiety is often associated with symptoms of depression, such as sadness, withdrawal, apathy, or difficulty in concentrating, and such children often fear that they or a family member might die. Young children experience nightmares or fears at bedtime.

About 4 percent of children and young adolescents suffer from separation anxiety disorder (DSM-IV). Among those who seek treatment, separation anxiety disorder is equally distributed between boys and girls. In survey samples, the disorder is more common in girls (DSM-IV). The disorder may be overdiagnosed in children and teenagers who live in dangerous neighborhoods and have reasonable fears of leaving home.

The remission rate with separation anxiety disorder is high. However, there are periods where the illness is more severe and other times when it remits. Sometimes the condition lasts many years or is a precursor to panic disorder with agoraphobia. Older individuals with separation anxiety disorder may have difficulty moving or getting married and may, in turn, worry about separation from their own children and partner.

The cause of separation anxiety disorder is not known, although some risk factors have been identified. Affected children tend to come from families that are very close-knit. The disorder might develop after a stress such as death or illness in the family or a move. Trauma, especially physical or sexual assault, might bring on the disorder (Goenjian et al., 1995). The disorder sometimes runs in families, but the precise role of genetic and environmental factors has not been established. The etiology of anxiety disorders is more thoroughly discussed in Chapter 4.

Generalized Anxiety Disorder Children with generalized anxiety disorder (or overanxious disorder of childhood) worry excessively about all manner of upcoming events and occurrences. They worry unduly about their academic performance or sporting activities, about being on time, or even about natural disasters such as earthquakes. The worry persists even when the child is not being judged and has always performed well in the past. Because of their anxiety, children may be overly conforming, perfectionist, or unsure of themselves. They tend to redo tasks if there are any imperfections. They tend to seek approval and need constant reassurance about their performance and their anxieties (DSM-IV). The 1-year prevalence rate for all generalized anxiety disorder sufferers of all ages is approximately 3 percent. The lifetime prevalence rate is about 5 percent (DSM-IV).

About half of all adults seeking treatment for this disorder report that it began in childhood or adolescence, but the proportion of children with this disorder who retain the problem into adulthood is unknown. The remission rate is not thought to be as high as that of separation anxiety disorder.

Social Phobia Children with social phobia (also called social anxiety disorder) have a persistent fear of being embarrassed in social situations, during a performance, or if they have to speak in class or in public, get into conversation with others, or eat, drink, or write in public. Feelings of anxiety in these situations produce physical reactions: palpitations, tremors, sweating, diarrhea, blushing, muscle tension, etc. Sometimes a full-blown panic attack ensues; sometimes the reaction is much more mild. Adolescents and adults are able to recognize that their fear is unreasonable or excessive, although this recognition does not prevent the fear. Children, however, might not recognize that their reaction is excessive, although they may be afraid that others will notice their anxiety and consider them odd or babyish.

Young children do not articulate their fears, but may cry, have tantrums, freeze, cling, appear extremely timid in strange social settings, shrink from contact with others, stay on the side during social events, and try to stay close to familiar adults. They may fall behind in school, avoid school completely, or avoid social activities among children their age. The avoidance of the fearful situations or worry preceding the feared event may last for weeks and interferes with the individual’s daily routine, social life, job, or school. They may find it impossible to speak in social situations or in the presence of unfamiliar people (for review of social phobia, see DSM-IV; Black et al., 1997).

Social phobia is common, the lifetime prevalence ranging from 3 to 13 percent, depending on how great the fear is and on how many different situations induce the anxiety (DSM-IV; Black et al., 1997). In survey studies, the majority of those with the disorder were found to be female (DSM-IV). Often the illness is lifelong, although it may become less severe or completely remit. Life events may reassure the individual or exacerbate the anxiety and disorder.

Treatment of Anxiety Although anxiety disorders are the most common disorder of youth, there is relatively little research on the efficacy of psychotherapy (Kendall et al., 1997). For childhood phobias, contingency management10 was the only intervention deemed to be well-established, according to an evaluation by Ollendick and King (1998), which applied the American Psychological Association Task Force criteria (noted earlier). Several psychotherapies are probably efficacious for treating phobias: systematic desensitization11 ; modeling, based on research by Bandura and colleagues, which capitalizes on an observational learning technique (Bandura, 1971; see also Chapter 2); and several cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) approaches

(Ollendick & King, 1998). CBT, as pioneered by Kendall and colleagues (Kendall et al., 1992; Kendall, 1994), is deemed by the American Psychological Association Task Force as probably efficacious. It has four major components: recognizing anxious feelings, clarifying cognitions in anxiety-provoking situations,12 developing a plan for coping, and evaluating the success of coping strategies. A more recent study in Australia added a parent component to CBT, which enhanced reduction in post-treatment anxiety disorder significantly compared with CBT alone (Barrett et al., 1996). However, none of the interventions identified above as well-established or probably efficacious has, for the most part, been tested in real-world settings.

In addition, psychodynamic treatment to address underlying fears and worries can be helpful, and behavior therapy may reduce the child’s fear of separation or of going to school; however, the experimental support for these approaches is limited.

Preliminary research suggests that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors may provide effective treatment of separation anxiety disorder and other anxiety disorders of childhood and adolescence. Two large-scale randomized controlled trials are currently being undertaken (Greenhill, 1998a, 1998b). Neither tricyclic antidepressants nor benzodiazepines have been shown to be more effective than placebo in children (Klein et al., 1992; Bernstein et al., 1998).

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), which is classified in DSM-IV as an anxiety disorder, is characterized by recurrent, time-consuming obsessive or compulsive behaviors that cause distress and/or impairment. The obsessions may be repetitive intrusive images, thoughts, or impulses. Often the compulsive behaviors, such as hand-washing or cleaning rituals, are an attempt to displace the obsessive thoughts (DSM-IV). Estimates of prevalence range from 0.2 to 0.8 percent in children, and up to 2% of adolescents (Flament et al., 1998).

There is a strong familial component to OCD, and there is evidence from twin studies of both genetic susceptibility and environmental influences. If one twin has OCD, the other twin is more likely to have OCD if the children are identical twins rather than fraternal twin pairs. OCD is increased among first-degree relatives of children with OCD, particularly among fathers (Lenane et al., 1990). It does not appear that the child is simply imitating the relative’s behavior, because children who develop OCD tend to have symptoms different from those of relatives with the disease (Leonard et al., 1997). Many adults with either childhood- or adolescent-onset of OCD show evidence of abnormalities in a neural network known as the orbitofrontalstriatal area (Rauch & Savage, 1997; Grachev et al., 1998).

Recent research suggests that some children with OCD develop the condition after experiencing one type of streptococcal infection (Swedo et al., 1995). This condition is referred to by the acronym PANDAS, which stands for Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated with Streptococcal infections. Its hallmark is a sudden and abrupt exacerbation of OCD symptoms after a strep infection. This form of OCD occurs when the immune system generates antibodies to the streptococcal bacteria, and the antibodies cross-react with the basal ganglia13 of a susceptible child, provoking OCD (Garvey et al., 1998). In other words, the cause of this form of OCD appears to be antibodies directed against the infection mistakenly attacking a region of the brain and setting off an inflammatory reaction.

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors appear effective in ameliorating the symptoms of OCD in children, although more clinical trials have been done with adults than with children. Several randomized, controlled trials revealed SSRIs to be effective in treating children and adolescents with OCD (Flament et al., 1985; DeVeaugh-Geiss et al., 1992; Riddle et al., 1992, 1998). The appropriate duration of treatment is still being studied. Side effects are not inconsequential: dry mouth, somnolence, dizziness, fatigue, tremors, and constipation occur at fairly high rates. Cognitive- behavioral treatments also have been used to treat OCD (March et al., 1997), but the evidence is not yet conclusive. Autism

Autism, the most common of the pervasive developmental disorders (with a prevalence of 10 to 12 children per 10,000 [Bryson & Smith, 1998]), is characterized by severely compromised ability to engage in, and by a lack of interest in, social interactions. It has roots in both structural brain abnormalities and genetic predispositions, according to family studies and studies of brain anatomy. The search for genes that predispose to autism is considered an extremely high research priority for the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH, 1998). Although the reported association between autism and obstetrical hazard may be due to genetic factors (Bailey et al., 1995), there is evidence that several different causes of toxic or infectious damage to the central nervous system during early development also may contribute to autism. Autism has been reported in children with fetal alcohol syndrome (Aronson et al., 1997), in children who were infected with rubella during pregnancy (Chess et al., 1978), and in children whose mothers took a variety of medications that are known to damage the fetus (Williams & Hersh, 1997).

Cognitive deficits in social perception likely result from abnormalities in neural circuitry. Children with autism have been studied with several imaging techniques, but no strongly consistent findings have emerged, although abnormalities in the cerebellum and limbic system (Rapin & Katzman, 1998) and larger brains (Piven, 1997) have been reported. In one small study (Zilbovicius et al., 1995), evidence of delayed maturation of the frontal cortex was found. The evidence for genetic influences include a much greater concordance in identical than in fraternal twins (Cook, 1998).

Treatment Because autism is a severe, chronic developmental disorder, which results in significant lifelong disability, the goal of treatment is to promote the child’s social and language development and minimize behaviors that interfere with the child’s functioning and learning. Intensive, sustained special education programs and behavior therapy early in life can increase the ability of the child with autism to acquire language and ability to learn. Special education programs in highly structured environments appear to help the child acquire self-care, social, and job skills. Only in the past decade have studies shown positive outcomes for very young children with autism. Given the severity of the impairment, high intensity of service needs, and costs (both human and financial), there has been an ongoing search for effective treatment.

Thirty years of research demonstrated the efficacy of applied behavioral methods in reducing inappropriate behavior and in increasing communication, learning, and appropriate social behavior. A well-designed study of a psychosocial intervention was carried out by Lovaas and colleagues (Lovaas, 1987; McEachin et al., 1993). Nineteen children with autism were treated intensively with behavior therapy for 2 years and compared with two control groups. Followup of the experimental group in first grade, in late childhood, and in adolescence found that nearly half the experimental group but almost none of the children in the matched control group were able to participate in regular schooling. Up to this point, a number of other research groups have provided at least a partial replication of the Lovaas model (see Rogers, 1998).

Several uncontrolled studies of comprehensive center-based programs have been conducted, focusing on language development and other developmental skills. A comprehensive model, Treatment and Education of Autistic and Related Communication Handicapped Children (TEACCH), demonstrated short-term gains for preschoolers with autism who received daily TEACCH home-teaching sessions, compared with a matched control group (Ozonoff & Cathcart, 1998). A review of other comprehensive, center-based programs has been conducted, focusing on elements considered critical to school-based programs, including minimum hours of service and necessary curricular components (Dawson & Osterling, 1997).

The antipsychotic drug, haloperidol, has been shown to be superior to placebo in the treatment of autism (Perry et al., 1989; Locascio et al., 1991), although a significant number of children develop dyskinesias as a side effect (Campbell et al., 1997). Two of the SSRIs, clomipramine (Gordon et al., 1993) and fluoxetine (McDougle et al., 1996), have been tested, with positive results, except in young autistic children, in whom clomipramine was not found to be therapeutic, and who experienced untoward side effects (Sanchez et al., 1996). Of note, preliminary studies of some of the newer antipsychotic drugs suggest that they may have fewer side effects than conventional antipsychotics such as haloperidol, but controlled studies are needed before firm conclusions can be drawn about any possible advantages in safety and efficacy over traditional agents. Disruptive Disorders

Disruptive disorders, such as oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder, are characterized by antisocial behavior and, as such, seem to be a collection of behaviors rather than a coherent pattern of mental dysfunction. These behaviors are also frequently found in children who suffer from attention-deficit/hyper-activity disorder, another disruptive disorder, which is discussed separately in this chapter. Children who develop the more serious conduct disorders often show signs of these disorders at an earlier age. Although it is common for a very young children to snatch something they want from another child, this kind of behavior may herald a more generally aggressive behavior and be the first sign of an emerging oppositional defiant or conduct disorder if it occurs by the ages of 4 or 5 and later. However, not every oppositional defiant child develops conduct disorder, and the difficult behaviors associated with these conditions often remit.

Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) is diagnosed when a child displays a persistent or consistent pattern of defiance, disobedience, and hostility toward various authority figures including parents, teachers, and other adults. ODD is characterized by such problem behaviors as persistent fighting and arguing, being touchy or easily annoyed, and deliberately annoying or being spiteful or vindictive to other people. Children with ODD may repeatedly lose their temper, argue with adults, deliberately refuse to comply with requests or rules of adults, blame others for their own mistakes, and be repeatedly angry and resentful. Stubbornness and testing of limits are common. These behaviors cause significant difficulties with family and friends and at school or work (DSM-IV; Weiner, 1997). Oppositional defiant disorder is sometimes a precursor of conduct disorder (DSM-IV).

In different studies, estimates of the prevalence of ODD have ranged from 1 to 6 percent, depending on the population sample and the way the disorder was evaluated, but not depending on diagnostic criteria. Rates are lower when impairment criteria are more strict and when information is obtained from teachers and parents rather than from the children alone (Shaffer et al., 1996a). Before puberty, the condition is more common in boys, but after puberty the rates in both genders are equal.

In preschool boys, high reactivity, difficulty being soothed, and high motor activity may indicate risk for the disorder. Marital discord, disrupted child care with a succession of different caregivers, and inconsistent, unsupervised child-rearing may contribute to the condition.

Children or adolescents with conduct disorder behave aggressively by fighting, bullying, intimidating, physically assaulting, sexually coercing, and/or being cruel to people or animals. Vandalism with deliberate destruction of property, for example, setting fires or smashing windows, is common, as are theft; truancy; and early tobacco, alcohol, and substance use and abuse; and precocious sexual activity. Girls with a conduct disorder are prone to running away from home and may become involved in prostitution. The behavior interferes with performance at school or work, so that individuals with this disorder rarely perform at the level predicted by their IQ or age. Their relationships with peers and adults are often poor. They have higher injury rates and are prone to school expulsion and problems with the law. Sexually transmitted diseases are common. If they have been removed from home, they may have difficulty staying in an adoptive or foster family or group home, and this may further complicate their development. Rates of depression, suicidal thoughts, suicide attempts, and suicide itself are all higher in children diagnosed with a conduct disorder (Shaffer et al., 1996b).

The prevalence of conduct disorder in 9- to 17-year-olds in the community varies from 1 to 4 percent, depending on how the disorder is defined (Shaffer et al., 1996a). Children with an early onset of the disorder, i.e., onset before age 10, are predominantly male. The disorder appears to be more common in cities than in rural areas (DSM-IV). Those with early onset have a worse prognosis and are at higher risk for adult antisocial personality disorder (DSM-IV; Rutter & Giller, 1984; Hendren & Mullen, 1997). Between a quarter and a half of highly antisocial children become antisocial adults.

The etiology of conduct disorder is not fully known. Studies of twins and adopted children suggest that conduct disorder has both biological (including genetic) and psychosocial components (Hendren & Mullen, 1997). Social risk factors for conduct disorder include early maternal rejection, separation from parents with no adequate alternative caregiver available, early institutionalization, family neglect, abuse or violence, parents’ psychiatric illness, parental marital discord, large family size, crowding, and poverty (Loeber & Stouthamer-Loeber, 1986). These factors are thought to lead to a lack of attachment to the parents or to the family unit and eventually to lack of regard for the rules and rewards of society (Sampson & Laub, 1993). Physical risk factors for conduct disorder include neurological damage caused by birth complications or low birthweight, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, fearlessness and stimulation-seeking behavior, learning impairments, autonomic underarousal, and insensitivity to physical pain and punishment. A child with both social deprivation and any of these neurological conditions is most susceptible to conduct disorder (Raine et al., 1998).

Since many of the risk factors for conduct disorder emerge in the first years of life, intervention must begin very early. Recently, screening instruments have been developed to enable earlier identification of risk factors and signs of conduct disorder in young children (Feil et al., 1995). Studies have shown a correlation between the behavior and attributes of 3-year-olds and the aggressive behavior of these children at ages 11 to 13 (Raine et al., 1998). Measurements of aggressive behaviors have been shown to be stable over time (Sampson & Laub, 1993). Training parents of high-risk children how to deal with the children’s demands may help. Parents may need to be taught to reinforce appropriate behaviors and not harshly punish transgressing ones, and encouraged to find ways to increase the strength of the emotional ties between parent and child. Working with high-risk children on social interaction and providing academic help to reduce rates of school failure can help prevent some of the negative educational consequences of conduct disorder (Johnson & Breckenridge, 1982).

Treatment Several psychosocial interventions can effectively reduce antisocial behavior in disruptive disorders. A recent review of psychosocial treatments for children and adolescents identified 82 studies conducted between 1966 and 1995 involving 5,272 youth (Brestan & Eyberg, 1998). The criterion for inclusion was that the child was in treatment for conduct problem behavior, based on displaying a symptom of conduct disorder or oppositional defiant disorder, rather than on a DSM diagnosis of either, although children did meet DSM criteria for one of these conditions in about one-third of the studies.

By applying criteria established by the American Psychological Association Task Force (see earlier) to the 82 studies, two treatments met criteria for well- established treatment and 10 for probably efficacious treatment. Two well-established treatments, both directed at training parents, succeeded in reducing problem behaviors. The two treatments were a parent training program based on the manual Living With Children (Bernal et al., 1980) and a videotape modeling parent training (Spaccarelli et al., 1992). The first teaches parents to reward desirable behaviors and ignore or punish deviant behaviors, based on principles of operant conditioning. The second provides a series of videotapes covering parent-training lessons, after which a therapist leads a group discussion of the videotape lessons. The identification of 12 treatments as well-established or probably efficacious is very encouraging because of the potential to intervene effectively with youth at high risk of poor outcomes. A new and promising approach for the treatment of conduct disorder is multisystemic therapy, an intensive home- and family-focused treatment that is described under Home-Based Services.

Despite strong enthusiasm for improving care for conduct-disordered youth, there are important groups of children, specifically girls and ethnic minority populations, who were not sufficiently represented in these studies to ensure that the identified treatments work for them. Other issues raised by Brestan and Eyberg (1998) are cost-effectiveness, the sufficiency of a given intervention, effectiveness over time, and the prevention of relapse.

No drugs have been demonstrated to be consistently effective in treating conduct disorder, although four drugs have been tested. Lithium and methylphenidate have been found (one double-blind placebo trial each) to reduce aggressiveness effectively in children with conduct disorder (Campbell et al., 1995; Klein et al., 1997b), but in two subsequent studies with the same design, the positive findings for lithium could not be reproduced (Rifkin et al., 1989; Klein, 1991). In one of the latter studies, methylphenidate was superior to lithium and placebo. A third drug, carbamazepine, was found in a pilot study to be effective, but multiple side effects were also reported (Kafantaris et al., 1992). The fourth drug, clonidine, was explored in an open trial, in which 15 of 17 patients showed a significant decrease in aggressive behavior, but there were also significant side effects that would require monitoring of cardiovascular and blood pressure parameters (Kemph et al., 1993). Substance Use Disorders in Adolescents

Since the early 1990s there has been a“sharp resurgence” in the misuse of alcohol and other drugs by adolescents (Johnston et al., 1996). A recent review, focusing particularly on substance abuse and dependence, synthesizes research findings of the past decade (Weinberg et al., 1998). The authors review epidemiology, course, etiology, treatment, and prevention and discuss comorbidity with other mental disorders in adolescents. All of these issues are important to public health, but none is more relevant to this report than the co-occurrence of alcohol and other substance use disorders with other mental disorders in adolescents.

According to the National Comorbidity Study, 41 to 65 percent of individuals with a lifetime substance abuse disorder also have a lifetime history of at least one mental disorder, and about 51 percent of those with one or more lifetime mental disorders also have a lifetime history of at least one substance use disorder (Kessler et al., 1996). The rates are highest in the 15- to 24-year-old age group (Kessler et al., 1994). The cross-sectional data on association do not permit any conclusion about causality or clinical prediction (Kessler et al., 1996), but an appealing theory suggests that a subgroup of the population abuses drugs in an effort to self-medicate for the co-occurring mental disorder. Little is actually known about the role of mental disorders in increasing the risk of children and adolescents for misuse of alcohol and other drugs. Stress appears to play a role in both the process of addiction and the development of many of the comorbid conditions.

The review by Weinberg and colleagues (1998) provides more detail on epidemiology and assessment of alcohol and other drug use in adolescents and describes several effective treatment approaches for these problems. A meta-analysis and literature review (Stanton & Shadish, 1997) concluded that family-oriented therapies were superior to other treatment approaches and enhanced the effectiveness of other treatments. Multisystemic family therapy, discussed elsewhere in this chapter, is effective in reducing alcohol and other substance use and other severe behavioral problems among adolescents (Pickrel & Henggeler, 1996). Eating Disorders

Eating disorders are serious, sometimes life- threatening, conditions that tend to be chronic (Herzog et al., 1999). They usually arise in adolescence and disproportionately affect females. About 3 percent of young women have one of the three main eating disorders: anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, or binge-eating disorder (Becker et al., 1999). Binge-eating disorder is a newly recognized condition featuring episodic uncontrolled consumption, without compensatory activities, such as vomiting or laxative abuse, to avert weight gain (Devlin, 1996). Bulimia, in contrast, is marked by both binge eating and by compensatory activities. Anorexia nervosa is characterized by low body weight (< 85 percent of expected weight), intense fear of weight gain, and an inaccurate perception of body weight or shape (DSM-IV). Its mean age of onset is 17 years (DSM-IV).

The causes of eating disorders are not known with precision but are thought to be a combination of genetic, neurochemical, psychodevelopmental, and sociocultural factors (Becker et al., 1999; Kaye et al., 1999). Comorbid mental disorders are exceedingly common, but interrelationships are poorly understood. Comorbid disorders include affective disorders (especially depression), anxiety disorders, substance abuse, and personality disorders (Herzog et al., 1996). Anorexia nervosa has the most severe consequence, with a mortality rate of 0.56 percent per year (or 5.6 percent per decade) (Sullivan, 1995), a rate higher than that of almost all other mental disorders (Herzog et al., 1996). Mortality is from starvation, suicide, or electrolyte imbalance (DSM-IV). The mortality rate from anorexia nervosa is 12 times higher than that for other young women in the population (Sullivan, 1995).

Treatment of eating disorders entails psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy, either alone or in combination. Treatment of comorbid mental disorders also is important, as is treatment of medical complications. There are some controlled studies of the efficacy of specific treatments for adults with bulimia and binge-eating disorder (Devlin, 1996), but fewer for anorexia nervosa (Kaye et al., 1999). Controlled studies in adolescents are rare for any eating disorder (Steiner and Lock, 1998). Pharmacological studies in young adult women found conflicting evidence of benefit from antidepressants for anorexia and some reduction in the frequency of bi